FACT: Clinton Emails Were Leaked – Not Hacked

World News Feed Feature

Craig Murray A little simple logic demolishes the CIA’s claims they claim they know the individuals involved

The CIA is still crawling with neocons. If they have evidence the Russians are behind some giant conspiracy, produce it.

Watch Bill Still  Talking points 

Give us another “Colin Powell at the UN” moment we can all laugh at. An anonymous leak to Jeff Bezos’ blog which is pure conjecture does not qualify as evidence. As the Trump transition team’s statement said, “These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.”


Bill Still considered by informed insiders’ as THE ultimate resource for fixing the National Debt problem and surviving Economic or Financial Collapse/Crash and attaining the unvarnished truth about Washington and today’s United States Political Climate.

Good evening, I’m still reporting on
Clinton Emails Were Leaked – Not Hacked
Good afternoon, I’m still reporting on the Clinton emails.
According to Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, and a friend of missing in action, Julian Assange, the CIA’s claims that Hillary Clinton’s emails were hacked by someone close to the Russian leadership are not true.
“They are absolutely making it up. I know who leaked them. I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things,” said Murray.
“America has not been shy about arresting whistleblowers and it’s not been shy about extraditing hackers. They plainly have no knowledge whatsoever.”
“A little simple logic demolishes the CIA’s claims. They claim they ‘know the individuals’ involved.”
“We are supposed to believe that in the most vital instance imaginable, an attempt by a foreign power to destabilize a US election, … nobody is going to be arrested or extradited?”
A group of top former intelligence officials agree. Writing in yesterday’s Consortiumnews.com, the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), write that the spokespersons for agencies supporting this theory are equivocating in the extreme – using terms such as “our best guess”, or “our estimate”., etc.
This sort of equivocation means they don’t know, according to William Binney, NSA’s former: Technical Director of the World for the Geopolitical and Military Analysis and Reporting Group – THE top NSA technical person alive – a man who worked there for 37 years.
This is not some wannabe who is guessing. This is the guy who designed the system.
According to Binney:
“CIA is almost totally dependent on NSA for ground truth in the communications arena. Thus, it remains something of a mystery why the media is being fed strange stories about hacking that have no basis in fact.”
“The evidence that should be there is absent; otherwise, it would surely be brought forward, since this could be done without any danger to sources and methods. “
Such an insider could be anyone in a government department or agency with access to NSA databases, or perhaps someone within the DNC.”

Focusing back on a domestic source is exactly the last thing that John Brennan, head of CIA, wants to happen. If called to testify, NSA officials might point to the source being someone within the Democratic National Committee, such as their former Voter Expansion Data Director, 27-year-old Seth Rich.
Rich was found shot in the back multiple times on July 10th, about a block from his home 2 miles north of the U.S. Capitol building at 4:20 am – early on Sunday morning, after staying up all night at his job at the DNC. The killer did not take Rich’s wallet, watch or cell phone.
Julian Assange offered a $20,000 reward for info on who killed Rich and has insisted throughout that the DNC emails were not the result of a Russian hack.
According to IT professionals, late Saturday night into Sunday morning is the best time for a person to breach a data system to copy files without being noticed.
Assange has not been heard from since his last tweet on Nov. 6 – the Sunday before election day:
“Hey @Hillary Clinton, You have until Monday to drop out, or we will destroy you completely.”
DCI Brennan is playing a very dangerous political game with the reputation of the CIA that could easily backfire on both he and Clinton by shining light on an area that President Trump had agreed to ignore – that is a prosecution of Hillary Clinton. However, with former intelligence officials now rising up – Trump may have to open this back up – just for self-protection.
I’m still reporting from Washington. Good day.

Bill Still is a former newspaper editor and publisher. He has written for USA Today, The Saturday Evening Post, the Los Angeles Times Syndicate, OMNI magazine, and has also produced the syndicated radio program, Health News.

Lionel Nation: CIA/FBI Say No Evidence of Russian Hacking, Electors Seek Unconstitutional Election Coup

World News Feed Feature
As the Interecept notes, WaPo published an explosive story that, in many ways, is classic American journalism of the worst sort: The key claims are based exclusively on the unverified assertions of anonymous officials, who in turn are disseminating their own claims about what the CIA purportedly believes, all based on evidence that remains completely secret.

7.50 minutes: in Russian Hacking, Cold War Stuff:

The Obama Administration’s Most Covert War – Israel News

Iran: Obama Bad Deal (01)

Over the past several weeks, we have learned that the Obama administration believes it is at war with Israel. The war is not a shooting war, but a political war. Its goal is to bring the government to its knees to the point where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu loses power or begs Obama and his advisers to shepherd Israel through a “peace process” in which Israel will renounce its rights to Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria.

One component of this war is espionage.

Last month The Wall Street Journal reported that Israel is a top target for American espionage.

The other component of the administration’s war against Israel is political subversion. Over the past week, the administration has campaigned against the NGO bill sponsored by Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked.1)Ayelet Shaked defends her NGO bill 2)Non Government Organisations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-governmental_organizationIf the bill, which was approved by the government, becomes law, it will require political NGOs that are principally financed by foreign governments to identify as foreign agents in their official communications and interactions.

Last week, State Department spokesman James Kirby lambasted the bill at an official briefing. Among other things, Kirby rejected Shaked’s claim that her bill is less restrictive than the US’s own 

Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked

Foreign Agents Registration Act. Kirby offered no substantiation of his claim. Earlier this week, US Ambassador Dan Shapiro met with Shaked. Following their meeting, the US Embassy published two statements attacking the NGO law. In one of them, the embassy sought to substantiate Kirby’s claim regarding FARA. By the embassy’s telling, FARA relates only to agents whose action are directly guided by foreign governments, while Shaked’s NGO bill relates to entities that receive financing from foreign governments whether or not their actions are directed by the government financiers.

The embassy’s claim is deeply misleading.

As attorney Lorri Lowenthal Marcus explained this week in The Jewish Press, in practice, the burden of proof that US entities are not directed by foreign governments that fund them falls on the entities, not on the US government. In her words, the US law “uses ambiguous words and tests which are far more likely to lead to over-broad applications and chilling of speech than does the straightforward Israeli proposal’s standard.”

Moreover, whereas Shaked’s proposed NGO law would fine entities that fail to abide by reporting restrictions, under FARA, US entities that fail to abide by the restrictions of the law can face both fines and up to five years in prison.

The duplicitous nature of the administration’s assault on Shaked’s bill is all the more obvious when we consider how senior US officials view these politicized organizations.

Currently, the State Department is slowly fulfilling a federal court order to publish the emails Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton sent from her private email server during her tenure as secretary of state. Over the past several weeks, the department has published a number of emails regarding Israel that reveal the depth of hostility Clinton’s closest advisers harbored toward Israel.

Last week, one such email demonstrated that Clinton’s senior anti-Israel advisers viewed radical Israeli-registered NGOs as agents for the administration to use in order to carry out covert anti-Israel policies.

The email in question is a letter Clinton received in December 2011 from retired ambassador Thomas Pickering. Clinton asked her chief of staff to print out his letter.

Pickering’s illustrious career reached its peak during Bill Clinton’s administration. Clinton’s husband appointed Pickering, a former ambassador to Israel, to serve as undersecretary of state for policy planning, the third-most senior position at the State Department.

Pickering retired in 2001, at the end of the Clinton years. Since retiring, he has enjoyed the status of elder statesman among the American foreign policy elite. He has also been a loyal supporter and lobbyist for Iran, and a signatory on numerous plans to stick it to Israel.

In his letter to Clinton, Pickering recommended using leftist NGOs – including Peace Now, which he mentioned by name – to destabilize the political situation on the ground in Israel.

Pickering set out a plan, which in his view would force Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to ask the Americans to initiate a new diplomatic process with the Palestinians.

Pickering’s plan involved organizing a protest movement of Palestinian and Israeli women to “bring continuing pressure to change minds at the top.”

On the Palestinian side, Pickering said, “there might be peaceful demonstrations against all aspects of the occupation on the Palestinian sides – roadblocks, land confiscations, new settlement activity, around military government installations and perhaps in Area C, which they do not control.”

These actions Pickering wrote, “could create the kind of action which no army can easily use force to deal with…. With all and only women demonstrating peacefully under the eyes of the world, the chances are much less force will be used against them, since that action has its own consequences.”

In other words, Pickering sought to organize provocations of IDF units “under the eyes of the world,” in which IDF soldiers would be portrayed as being mean to Palestinian women. These women for their part would provoke them to be mean by interfering with military operations or disrupting the lives of Israeli citizens in Judea and Samaria.

Pickering made no bones about the covert nature of this US anti-Israel subversion. He warned Clinton, “Most of all the United States, in my view, cannot be seen to have stimulated encouraged or be the power behind it for reasons you will understand better than anyone.

“I believe third parties and a number of NGOs on both sides would help.”

That is, Clinton’s confidante, the elder statesman who organized a lobby on behalf of Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran, called for the secretary of state to use radical Israeli NGOs as US agents to carry out a covert US operation against an allied government.

A notable aspect of Pickering’s plan is his underlying assumption that the US-organized demonstrations would be filmed and used against Israel in the court of public opinion.

For the past several years, the US government has funded B’Tselem’s video project.

According to NGO Monitor, in 2014 the US paid some $68,000 for the project which provides video cameras and photographic training to Palestinians. The goal is for them to film IDF soldiers and Israeli civilians in fraught situations and call their morality and legitimacy into question.

It was his recognition that cameras are the new weapon of Israel’s enemies that caused Gilad Ach, a 32-year-old master’s student at Tel Aviv University, to form his own NGO – Ad Kan. Ad Kan’s goal is to penetrate radical Israeli NGOs to expose their problematic activities.

In a bit of bad timing for the administration, last Thursday, the same day Kirby launched the administration’s public assault against Shaked’s NGO bill, and just before Pickering’s email to Clinton was published, Uvda, Channel 2’s investigative news magazine, broadcast a report revealing some of the findings that Ach and his colleagues have uncovered in Ad Kan’s three-year operation.

Over the past three years, Ad Kan employees have seeded themselves inside radical Israeli NGOs and surreptitiously filmed their operations.

The footage broadcast last week on Uvda showed senior “human rights” operatives for B’Tselem and Ta’ayush, Nasser Nawajah and Ezra Nawi, plotting to bring about the arrest, torture and murder of a Palestinian by the Palestinian Authority’s US-trained and -funded security services.

The Palestinian in question was, as far as they were concerned, marked for torture and murder because he was hoping to sell his land to Jews in the South Hebron Hills around the Israeli community of Sussiya.

One of the strangest aspects of the Uvda report was the radical Left’s response to it. By and large, leftist groups refused to condemn what Nawi and Nawajah were doing. B’Tselem, which is supposed to fight for Palestinian human rights, said that it is legitimate to turn Palestinians who wish to sell their property to Jews over to the PA, despite the fact that the PA’s penalty for such actions is death.

Beyond what their refusal to condemn solicitation of murder and torture says about their commitment to Palestinian human rights, the radical Left’s silence reveals just how key Nawi and Nawajah are to their operations.

In a word, Nawajah and Nawi are superstars of the radical Left in Israel and throughout the Western world. Last July, Nawajeh published an op-ed in The New York Times. In it, he accused Israel of denying the property rights of Palestinians in the exact area where he and Nawi plotted the murder of a Palestinian who sought to exercise his property rights by selling his land to Israelis.

As Liel Liebowitz reported in the Tablet online magazine, in 2007, after Nawi was arrested at a violent protest against the IDF, 20,000 people, including the who’s who of the radical Left in Israel and in the US, signed a petition demanding his immediate release.

Leading members of the Boycott, Sanctions and Divestment movement in the US, including Jewish Voices for Peace, have financed Nawi’s activities.

Pickering recommended using NGOs to organize protests. Ad Kan exposed how this is done.

On Monday, Channel 2 broadcast Ad Kan surveillance footage showing a Breaking the Silence employee paying Nawi and his Ta’ayush colleague Guy Botavia for organizing a demonstration against IDF soldiers. Botavia serves as the head of Ta’ayush’s video project.

In the same report, Ta’ayush activists are filmed paying Palestinians in cash for participating in the demonstration, in which they threw rocks at IDF soldiers.

In a conversation this week with The Jerusalem Post, Ach claimed that without the NGOs, the Palestinians would not be demonstrating. “I asked one of the Palestinians if he would be rioting if the NGO wasn’t paying him. He said no.

“I asked him what he does when he isn’t rioting.

He said he’s a construction worker in Modi’in Illit, [an Israeli settlement beyond the 1949 armistice lines]. That is, five days a week, Israelis pay him to build settlements, and the rest of the week, other Israelis pay him to throw rocks on soldiers.

“This guy only works for Israelis – either to build or destroy,” Ach wryly noted.

One of the common claims the far Left has made in response to the Uvda report is that if the report is all Ad Kan managed to learn in three years of planting moles in these groups, then clearly there is nothing to expose.

But Ach explains, what Ad Kan has revealed to date is merely the tip of the iceberg.

And so, as the Obama administration ratchets up its political war against Israel in its final year in office, we can expect to learn that like the administration itself, the NGOs the administration is so concerned about protecting have and will stop at nothing to achieve their goal of demonizing Israel and destroying its good name in the Western world.

By Caroline Glick | January 18, 2016 | Source:  breakingisraelnews.com "The Obama Administration’s Most Covert War - Israel News"

References   [ + ]

1. Ayelet Shaked defends her NGO bill
2. Non Government Organisations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-governmental_organization

THE WATCHMEN: Secrets of the CIA (3)

John 8:32 (ESV)


How the CIA Waged War in Afghanistan

Robert Grenier is a former CIA station chief for Afghanistan and Pakistan, and the man who was tapped by the CIA and White House to direct the first America-Afghan war following the attacks of 9/11. In his new book, 88 Days to Kandahar, Grenier discusses how he forged alliances with warlords and Pakistani intelligence operatives to execute a campaign that defeated the Taliban in Afghanistan’s southern region.

Following his work in Pakistan and Afghanistan, Grenier returned to Washington, DC, and was tasked with overseeing the CIA’s intelligence operations and analysis in Iraq prior to the 2003 US invasion.

VICE News visited Grenier at his home in Virginia to talk about America’s longest war, the CIA’s use of “enhanced interrogation techniques,” and the rise of the Islamic State.

THE WATCHMEN: Secrets of the CIA (2)

John 8:32 (ESV)


CIA WhistleBlower Susan Lindauer


The Summer of 2001,Former Congressional staffer and CIA Asset Susan Lindauer warned the Government about a major attack involving the World Trade Center.Lindauer provides an extraordinary first-hand account from behind the intelligence curtain that shatters the government’s lies about 9/11 and Iraq, and casts a harsh spotlight on the workings of the Patriot Act as
the ideal weapon to bludgeon whistleblowers and dissidents.

A terrifying true story of “black budget” betrayals and the Patriot Act, with its arsenal of secret evidence, indefinite detention and threats of forcible drugging.


EXTREME PREJUDICE(Book by Susan Lindauer) reveals one Asset’s desperate struggle to survive the brutal cover ups of 9/11 and Iraq. EXTREME PREJUDICE delivers a high tension expose of the real facts surrounding the CIA’s advance warnings of 9/11 and Iraq’s contributions to the 9/11 investigation.

Further Review and link to the book at this Link.

Susan’s book “Extreme Prejudice” can be purchased on Amazon. http://www.amazon.com/Extreme-Prejudi…
She in urgent need of book sales and donations. Please consider a donation to her paypal account with her email slindauer2008@yahoo.com

(Disclaimer: Views and opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of the makers of this video and is presented for educational and informational purposes only)