We Just Witnessed 3 Major Developments That Could Easily Lead To Global War

Authored by Michael Snyder via The End of The American Dream blog,




It has been a seemingly quiet summer in America so far, but meanwhile, we are witnessing major developments on the other side of the globe that could change everything. 

We are so close to war, and yet most people have absolutely no idea what is happening.  

In fact, if you showed most Americans a blank map of the world, they couldn’t even pick out Iran, Hong Kong or North Korea.

There is so much apathy in our society today, and so little knowledge about foreign affairs, and so most people simply do not grasp the importance of the drama that is playing out right in front of our eyes.  But if a major war does erupt, none of our lives are ever going to be the same again.  So I am going to keep writing about these things because I believe that we have reached an absolutely critical juncture in our history.


Let’s start with a stunning new development in the Middle East.

Even though most Americans do not realize it, Israel and Iran are already shooting at each other.  Israel has been striking Iranian military targets inside Syria for months, but now the rules of engagement have apparently changed because in recent days the IDF has started conducting airstrikes against Iranian targets inside Iraq[1]Date-stamped: Jul 30, 2019  –  Time-stamped: 22:44,  Author: By Oli smith  Article Title: Will Israel strike Iran? ‘Unprecedented’ bombings close to Tehran border sparks WW3 … Continue reading

In an unprecedented move, Israel has expanded its attacks on Iranian targets, with two bombing strikes on Iran-run bases in Iraq in the space of ten days. The Israeli Air Force carried out the military strikes with F-35 jets, according to Asharq Al-Awsat, an Arabic-language newspaper published in London. News of the attacks comes just a day after the US and Israel tested a missile defence system which used targets “similar to Iranian nuclear missiles”.

The reason this is being called “an unprecedented move” is because this is the very first time since 1981 that we have seen Israeli airstrikes inside Iraq.

Needless to say, these latest airstrikes have absolutely enraged the Iranians.  It looks like the Israeli government has determined that any Iranian military targets outside of Iran itself are fair game, and it is probably only a matter of time before Iran strikes back in a major way.

And if Iran ultimately decides that one of the best ways to strike back is to start hitting targets inside of Israel, that could be the spark that sets off a major war in the Middle East.


Meanwhile, it appears that something major is brewing in China.

The political protests that have made global headlines in Hong Kong in recent weeks have greatly angered the Chinese government.  They were probably hoping that the protests would quickly subside and soon be forgotten, but that hasn’t happened.

So now China is faced with a decision.  If such protests were happening elsewhere in China, they would be brutally crushed, but Hong Kong is a special case.

If the Chinese are too harsh with the protesters in Hong Kong, that could turn world opinion against them, but if they do nothing that could encourage protests to start happening in other areas of the country.

In the end, the Chinese will probably do what they always do, and that means crushing the opposition.  And Zero Hedge is reporting that Chinese forces are currently gathering “on Hong Kong’s border”[2]Date-stamped: 07/31/2019  –  Time-stamped: 04:36  Author: Tyler Durden  Article Title: Crackdown Coming? China Gathers Forces On Hong Kong Border Amid Unrest Article Link: … Continue reading

Massive anti-Beijing protests which have gripped Hong Kong over the past month, and have become increasingly violent as both an overwhelmed local police force and counter-protesters have hit back with force, are threatening to escalate on a larger geopolitical scale after the White House weighed in this week.

With China fast losing patience, there are new reports of a significant build-up of Chinese security forces on Hong Kong’s border, as Bloomberg reports:

The White House is monitoring what a senior administration official called a congregation of Chinese forces on Hong Kong’s border.

Technically, Hong Kong is considered to be part of China, but it has always been allowed wide latitude to govern itself ever since it was handed over to the Chinese.

But now things could be about to change dramatically, and some are even using the word “invade” to describe what is about to happen.  For example, just consider this tweet from Kyle Bass[3]Date-stamped: Jul 31, 2019  –  Time-stamped: 2:58 AM  Author: twitter.com/Jkylebass – Article Link: https://twitter.com/Jkylebass/status/1156277822580842496?s=20

“The White House is monitoring a buildup of Chinese forces on Hong Kong’s border, a senior administration official said.” Here we go..the moment the pla army marches from Shenzhen, it’s over. china’s army is going to invade HK. It’s inevitable. #hk #china

If Chinese forces start pouring into Hong Kong, the Trump administration is going to throw a fit.  Relations between our two nations are already the worst that they have been since the end of the Korean War, and the situation in Hong Kong could potentially push things over the edge.

In fact, the Chinese have already been placing the blame for the protests in Hong Kong squarely on the U.S. government[4]Date-stamped: 07/31/2019  –  Time-stamped: 04:36  Author: by Tyler Durden  Article Title: Crackdown Coming? China Gathers Forces On Hong Kong Border Amid Unrest Article Link: … Continue reading

“It’s clear that Mr. Pompeo has put himself in the wrong position and still regards himself as the head of the CIA,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said at a news briefing“He might think that violent activities in Hong Kong are reasonable because after all, this is the creation of the U.S.”

China’s position has been to recently declare the protests going “far beyond” what’s legal and “peaceful” amid clashes with police.

We shall see what happens, but this certainly has the potential to push the United States and China much, much closer to conflict.


On top of everything else, North Korea just fired two more missiles into the ocean[5]Date-stamped: 31 July 2019  –  Time-stamped: 00:29  Author: by Reuters  Article Title: North Korea fires short-range ballistic missiles – South Korean military Article Link: … Continue reading

North Korea fired two short-range ballistic missiles early on Wednesday, the South Korean military said, only days after it launched two other missiles intended to pressure South Korea and the United States to stop upcoming military drills.

The latest launches were from the Hodo peninsula on North Korea’s east coast, the same area from where last week’s were conducted, South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) said in a statement. It said it was monitoring in case of additional launches.

The North Koreans are greatly alarmed by the joint military drills that the U.S. and South Korea will soon be conducting, and whenever they get greatly upset about something they seem to express that displeasure by firing off more missiles.

Yes, President Trump and Kim Jong-Un have been talking, but things remain extremely tense and it wouldn’t take very much at all for a major conflict to erupt on the Korean peninsula.

Without a doubt, we live at a time of “wars and rumours of wars”, and those with discerning eyes can see what is happening.

The chess pieces are slowly being moved into place, and the combatants are almost ready.

Any number of things could ultimately spark World War 3, and once it begins it is going to be nearly impossible to stop.

Original Source: Date-stamped: 2019 JULY 31 | Time-stamped: 20:45 | Author: by Michael Snyder | Article Title: We Just Witnessed 3 Major Developments That Could Easily Lead To Global War Article Link: zerohedge.com


1 Date-stamped: Jul 30, 2019  –  Time-stamped: 22:44,  Author: By Oli smith  Article Title: Will Israel strike Iran? ‘Unprecedented’ bombings close to Tehran border sparks WW3 fears Article Link: https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1159848/World-War-3-Israel-Iran-military-strikes-US-nuclear-attack
2 Date-stamped: 07/31/2019  –  Time-stamped: 04:36  Author: Tyler Durden  Article Title: Crackdown Coming? China Gathers Forces On Hong Kong Border Amid Unrest Article Link: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-30/china-mustering-forces-hong-kong-border-quell-protests-white-house-source
3 Date-stamped: Jul 31, 2019  –  Time-stamped: 2:58 AM  Author: twitter.com/Jkylebass – Article Link: https://twitter.com/Jkylebass/status/1156277822580842496?s=20
4 Date-stamped: 07/31/2019  –  Time-stamped: 04:36  Author: by Tyler Durden  Article Title: Crackdown Coming? China Gathers Forces On Hong Kong Border Amid Unrest Article Link: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-30/china-mustering-forces-hong-kong-border-quell-protests-white-house-source
5 Date-stamped: 31 July 2019  –  Time-stamped: 00:29  Author: by Reuters  Article Title: North Korea fires short-range ballistic missiles – South Korean military Article Link: http://news.trust.org/item/20190731000806-6sfvw

Should You Worry About Getting Bitten by a Shark? 2019 JUL 29

This is meant to make me feel safe:

Sharks don’t “hunt” humans. And shark bites are almost always cases of mistaken identity.

Heads up For me! it’s not working

AUSTRALIA: Bad news for Males and being in Western Australia Folks and if you really want to feel safe about Sharks and not being attacked whilst you wade in the water you need to go to the Northern Territory for your safe day out at the beach when it comes to Sharks.

▪️ New South Wales 2000 – 2019 5 deaths (4 Males 1 Female)
▪️ Queensland 2000 – 2019 7 deaths (6 Males 1 Female)
▪️ South Australia 2000 – 2019 7 deaths (7 Males 0 Female)
▪️ Tasmania 2000 – 2019 1 deaths (1 Male 0 Female)
▪️ Western Australia 2000 – 2019 15 deaths (13 Male 2 Female)
▪️ Northern Territory 2000 – 2019 0 deaths (0 Male 0 Female)


2019 Australia’s biggest Tax Dodgers using 4 years Australian Tax Office transparency data.

Counting down Australia’s biggest Tax Dodgers using 4 years Australian Tax Office transparency data.
by michaelwest.com.au You can follow Michael on Twitter @MichaelWestBiz.

Australia’s Ten biggest Tax Dodgers

No: 1 ExxonMobil Australia Pty Ltd
How they did this: (Read Full Article)

4-year total income $33,170,960,652
4-year taxable income Nil
Margin total income taxable 00.00%
4-year tax payable Nil
Tax Rate 00.00%
Auditor PwC
Industry Oil And Gas

No: 2 EnergyAustralia Holdings Limited
How they did this:
(Read Full Article)

4-year total income $30,229,662,288
4-year taxable income $51,800,099
Margin total income taxable 00.17%
4-year tax payable Nil
Tax Rate 00.00%
Auditor PwC
Industry Oil & Gas

No: 3 Virgin Australia Holdings Limited
How they did this: (Read Full Article)

4-year total income $17,907,315,984
4-year taxable income Nil
Margin total income taxable 00.00%
4-year tax payable Nil
Tax Rate 00.00%
Auditor KPMG
Industry Aviation

No: 4 Vodafone Hutchison Australia Pty Ltd
How they did this: (Read Full Article)

4-year total income $15,177,114,880
4-year taxable income Nil
Margin total income taxable 00.00%
4-year tax payable Nil
Tax Rate 00.00%
Auditor PwC
Industry Telecommunications

No: 5 Santos Limited
How they did this: (Read Full Article)

4-year total income $14,938,146,824
4-year taxable income $27,340,938
Margin total income taxable 00.18%
4-year tax payable $3,147,975
Tax Rate 11.51%
Auditor EY
Industry Oil and Gas

No: 6 Pomi Pty Limited
How they did this: (Read Full Article)

4 year total income $14,065,374,206
4 year taxable income $1,692,587
Margin total income taxable 00.01%
4 year tax payable $507,776
Tax Rate 30.00%
Industry Financial services

No: 7 Peabody Australia Holdco Pty Ltd
How they did this: (Read Full Article)

4-year total income $12,269,988,454
4-year taxable income Nil
Margin total income taxable 00.00%
4-year tax payable Nil
Tax Rate 00.00%
Auditor EY
Industry Coal mining

No: 8 Amcor Limited
How they did this: (Read Full Article)

4-year total income $11,707,779,637
4-year taxable income $34,889,349
Margin total income taxable 00.30%
4-year tax payable Nil
Tax Rate 00.00%
Auditor PwC
Industry Packaging

No: 9 Fletcher Building (Australia) Pty Ltd
How they did this: (Read Full Article)

4-year total income $11,510,284,427
4-year taxable income $35,968,543
Margin total income taxable 00.31%
4-year tax payable $5,703,073
Tax Rate 15.86%
Auditor EY
Industry Building products

No: 10 Ford Motor Company of Australia Ltd
How they did this: (Read Full Article)

4-year total income $11,108,515,129
4-year taxable income $44,836,317
Margin total income taxable 00.40%
4-year tax payable Nil
Tax Rate 00.00%
Auditor PwC
Industry Automotive

Australia’s following thirty biggest Tax Dodgers

11 Chevron Australia Holdings Pty Ltd
12 Hewlett Packard South Pacific Pty Ltd
13 Spotless Group Holdings Limited
14 BG International (Aus) Pty Limited
15 Nissan Motor Co (Australia) Pty Ltd
16 BNP Paribas S.A.
17 Puma Energy (Australia) Holdings Pty Ltd
18 Agrium SP Holdings Pty Limited
19 Healthscope Ltd
20 SABMiller Australia Pty Ltd
21 Food Investments Pty Limited
22 Citic Resources Australia Pty Ltd
23 Mitsubishi Motors Australia Limited
24 Foxtel Cable Television Pty Limited
25 Mirvac Limited
26 New Zealand Milk (Australasia) Pty Ltd
27 Sime Darby Industrial Australia Pty Ltd
28 Swiss Re Australia Limited
29 Ingram Micro Holdings (Australia) Pty Ltd
30 Sumitomo Australia Pty Ltd
31 CSR Limited
32 BPIH Pty Limited
33 Yancoal Australia Limited
34 Hannover Life Re Of Australasia Ltd
35 Wilmar Australia Holdings Pty Limited
36 Stockland Corporation Limited
37 ING Bank NV (Sydney Branch)
38 UGL Pty Ltd
39 Burns Philp & Co Pty Limited
40 Victoria Power Networks Pty Ltd

Ask your MP why and what is being done to stop this evasion of Tax by Large Corporate Entities

Parliament Contact List 

The Squeaky wheel always gets attention

VIDEO: 2019 MAY 2019 White House lawyer Flood letter to Barr on Mueller report


White House lawyers sent a furious letter about the Mueller report and it got one thing right.

“The Special Counsel and his staff failed in their duty to act as prosecutors and only as prosecutors”

Sebastian Gorka

“Robert Mueller’s actions were in contravention with the Constitution.”  Sebastian Gorka on the White House letter to Barr.

Fox News said: The White House tore into Robert Mueller and his investigators in a recent letter to Attorney General Bill Barr that argued the special counsel’s team included “political statements” in their Russia report and “failed” to act as traditional prosecutors — while stating President Trump reserves his right to invoke executive privilege on matters related to the report.

[pdf-embedder url=”http://4cminews.com/wp-content/uploads/408443675-Flood-letter-to-Barr-on-Mueller-report.pdf”]

AG Barr Delivers Detailed Remarks ‘Mueller Report’ Russian Interference 2016 Election

Attorney General William P. Barr Delivers Remarks on the Release of the Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election


Thursday, April 18, 2019

Good Morning.  Thank you all for being here today.

On March 22, 2019, Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded his investigation of matters related to Russian attempts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and submitted his confidential report to me pursuant to Department of Justice regulations. 

As I said during my Senate confirmation hearing and since, I am committed to ensuring the greatest possible degree of transparency concerning the Special Counsel’s investigation, consistent with the law.

At 11:00 this morning, I will transmit copies of a public version of the Special Counsel’s report to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees.  The Department of Justice will also make the report available to the American public by posting it on the Department’s website after it has been delivered to Congress.

I would like to offer a few comments today on the report. 

But before I do that, I want to thank Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein for joining me here today and for his assistance and counsel throughout this process.  Rod has served the Department of Justice for many years with dedication and distinction, and it has been a great privilege and pleasure to work with him since my confirmation.  He had well-deserved plans to step back from public service that I interrupted by asking him to help in my transition.  Rod has been an invaluable partner, and I am grateful that he was willing to help me and has been able to see the Special Counsel’s investigation to its conclusion.  Thank you, Rod.

I would also like to thank Special Counsel Mueller for his service and the thoroughness of his investigation, particularly his work exposing the nature of Russia’s attempts to interfere in our electoral process. 

As you know, one of the primary purposes of the Special Counsel’s investigation was to determine whether members of the presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump, or any individuals associated with that campaign, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election.  Volume I of the Special Counsel’s report describes the results of that investigation.  As you will see, the Special Counsel’s report states that his “investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” 

I am sure that all Americans share my concerns about the efforts of the Russian government to interfere in our presidential election.  As the Special Counsel’s report makes clear, the Russian government sought to interfere in our election.  But thanks to the Special Counsel’s thorough investigation, we now know that the Russian operatives who perpetrated these schemes did not have the cooperation of President Trump or the Trump campaign – or the knowing assistance of any other Americans for that matter.  That is something that all Americans can and should be grateful to have confirmed. 

The Special Counsel’s report outlines two main efforts by the Russian government to influence the 2016 election:

First, the report details efforts by the Internet Research Agency, a Russian company with close ties to the Russian government, to sow social discord among American voters through disinformation and social media operations.  Following a thorough investigation of this disinformation campaign, the Special Counsel brought charges in federal court against several Russian nationals and entities for their respective roles in this scheme.  Those charges remain pending, and the individual defendants remain at large.

But the Special Counsel found no evidence that any Americans – including anyone associated with the Trump campaign – conspired or coordinated with the Russian government or the IRA in carrying out this illegal scheme.  Indeed, as the report states, “[t]he investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly or intentionally coordinated with the IRA’s interference operation.”  Put another way, the Special Counsel found no “collusion” by any Americans in the IRA’s illegal activity.

Second, the report details efforts by Russian military officials associated with the GRU to hack into computers and steal documents and emails from individuals affiliated with the Democratic Party and the presidential campaign of Hillary Rodham Clinton for the purpose of eventually publicizing those emails.  Obtaining such unauthorized access into computers is a federal crime.  Following a thorough investigation of these hacking operations, the Special Counsel brought charges in federal court against several Russian military officers for their respective roles in these illegal hacking activities. 

Those charges are still pending and the defendants remain at large.

But again, the Special Counsel’s report did not find any evidence that members of the Trump campaign or anyone associated with the campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its hacking operations.  In other words, there was no evidence of Trump campaign “collusion” with the Russian government’s hacking

The Special Counsel’s investigation also examined Russian efforts to publish stolen emails and documents on the internet.  The Special Counsel found that, after the GRU disseminated some of the stolen materials through its own controlled entities, DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0, the GRU transferred some of the stolen materials to Wikileaks for publication.  Wikileaks then made a series of document dumps.  The Special Counsel also investigated whether any member or affiliate of the Trump campaign encouraged or otherwise played a role in these dissemination efforts.  Under applicable law, publication of these types of materials would not be criminal unless the publisher also participated in the underlying hacking conspiracy. 

Here too, the Special Counsel’s report did not find that any person associated with the Trump campaign illegally participated in the dissemination of the materials.

Finally, the Special Counsel investigated a number of “links” or “contacts” between Trump Campaign officials and individuals connected with the Russian government during the 2016 presidential campaign. 

After reviewing those contacts, the Special Counsel did not find any conspiracy to violate U.S. law involving Russia-linked persons and any persons associated with the Trump campaign.


After nearly two years of investigation, thousands of subpoenas, and hundreds of warrants and witness interviews, the Special Counsel confirmed that the Russian government sponsored efforts to illegally interfere with the 2016 presidential election but did not find that the Trump campaign or other Americans colluded in those schemes. 


After finding no underlying collusion with Russia, the Special Counsel’s report goes on to consider whether certain actions of the President could amount to obstruction of the Special Counsel’s investigation. 

As I addressed in my March 24th letter, the Special Counsel did not make a traditional prosecutorial judgment regarding this allegation.  Instead, the report recounts ten episodes involving the President and discusses potential legal theories for connecting these actions to elements of an obstruction offense.

After carefully reviewing the facts and legal theories outlined in the report, and in consultation with the Office of Legal Counsel and other Department lawyers, the Deputy Attorney General and I concluded that the evidence developed by the Special Counsel is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense. 

Although the Deputy Attorney General and I disagreed with some of the Special Counsel’s legal theories and felt that some of the episodes examined did not amount to obstruction as a matter of law, we did not rely solely on that in making our decision.  Instead, we accepted the Special Counsel’s legal framework for purposes of our analysis and evaluated the evidence as presented by the Special Counsel in reaching our conclusion. 

In assessing the President’s actions discussed in the report, it is important to bear in mind the context.  

President Trump faced an unprecedented situation.  As he entered into office, and sought to perform his responsibilities as President, federal agents and prosecutors were scrutinizing his conduct before and after taking office, and the conduct of some of his associates. 

At the same time, there was relentless speculation in the news media about the President’s personal culpability.  Yet, as he said from the beginning, there was in fact no collusion.

And as the Special Counsel’s report acknowledges, there is substantial evidence to show that the President was frustrated and angered by a sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks. 

Nonetheless, the White House fully cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation, providing unfettered access to campaign and White House documents, directing senior aides to testify freely, and asserting no privilege claims.  And at the same time, the President took no act that in fact deprived the Special Counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation.

Apart from whether the acts were obstructive, this evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the President had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation.

Now, before I take questions, I want to address a few aspects of the process for producing the public report that I am releasing today. 

As I said several times, the report contains limited redactions relating to four categories of information.  To ensure as much transparency as possible, these redactions have been clearly labelled and color-coded so that readers can tell which redactions correspond to which categories.

As you will see, most of the redactions were compelled by the need to prevent harm to ongoing matters and to comply with court orders prohibiting the public disclosure of information bearing upon ongoing investigations and criminal cases, such as the IRA case and the Roger Stone case.

These redactions were applied by Department of Justice attorneys working closely together with attorneys from the Special Counsel’s Office, as well as with the intelligence community, and prosecutors who are handling ongoing cases.  The redactions are their work product.   

Consistent with long-standing Executive Branch practice, the decision whether to assert Executive privilege over any portion of the report rested with the President of the United States.  Because the White House voluntarily cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation, significant portions of the report contain material over which the President could have asserted privilege.  And he would have been well within his rights to do so. 

Following my March 29th letter, the Office of the White House Counsel requested the opportunity to review the redacted version of the report in order to advise the President on the potential invocation of privilege, which is consistent with long-standing practice. 

Following that review, the President confirmed that, in the interests of transparency and full disclosure to the American people, he would not assert privilege over the Special Counsel’s report. 

Accordingly, the public report I am releasing today contains redactions only for the four categories that I previously outlined, and no material has been redacted based on executive privilege. 

In addition, earlier this week, the President’s personal counsel requested and were given the opportunity to read a final version of the redacted report before it was publicly released.  That request was consistent with the practice followed under the Ethics in Government Act, which permitted individuals named in a report prepared by an Independent Counsel the opportunity to read the report before publication.  The President’s personal lawyers were not permitted to make, and did not request, any redactions. 

In addition to making the redacted report public, we are also committed to working with Congress to accommodate their legitimate oversight interests with respect to the Special Counsel’s investigation.  We have been consulting with Chairman Graham and Chairman Nadler throughout this process, and we will continue to do so. 

Given the limited nature of the redactions, I believe that the publicly released report will allow every American to understand the results of the Special Counsel’s investigation. 

Nevertheless, in an effort to accommodate congressional requests, we will make available to a bipartisan group of leaders from several Congressional committees a version of the report with all redactions removed except those relating to grand-jury information. 

Thus, these members of Congress will be able to see all of the redacted material for themselves – with the limited exception of that which, by law, cannot be shared. 

I believe that this accommodation, together with my upcoming testimony before the Senate and House Judiciary Committees, will satisfy any need Congress has for information regarding the Special Counsel’s investigation.

Once again, I would like to thank you all for being here today.  I now have a few minutes for questions.

A Comparison of Violence in the Bible & the Koran

by Bill Warner PhD (Politicalislam.com)

A recent study (by Tom Anderson) makes the claim that the Bible is as violent as the Koran. Hence there is no need to worry about with Islam. It is just like Christianity and Judaism.

My only interest is in political violence, not when Cain killed Able. Political violence is when a group attack those outsides of it. It is political when Muslims kill Kafirs in jihad, for instance. This eliminates counting personal violence and internal wars.

Bill Warner PhD said

? We want to measure ideas, so we count more than individual sentences.

? We need to count all the content that applies to ‘the political’ violence.




0 (zero)
words about political violence

words about political violence

words about political violence

Not on One occassion is there a record in the New Testament that Jesus himself or the first Generation leaders of Christianity preceeding the Death of Jesus taught/teaching Violence as a being part of a disciple of Jesus. Nor is it so today 2019

The violence in the Old Testament is historical in nature, not prescriptive, Nor is it so today 2019

The violence in Islam is prescriptively applicable to all people and times. Jihad is forever. This data makes sense. 2019 It will be jihadists committing murder in the morning news, not Methodists or Mennonites.

In short, there are nearly 10 times as much political violence in Islamic doctrine that there is in the Bible.

Above: Chart by Bill Warner PhD [1]Source: see URL http://cspipublishing.com/statistical/charts.html#Bible Raw Data: PDF BELOW

[pdf-embedder url=”http://4cminews.com/wp-content/uploads/OldTestamentViolentPassages.pdf”]
Prime Source: Political Islam | Published on Apr 13, 2016 Other sources: independent.co.uk | 9 February 2016 | Titled: 'Violence more common' in Bible than Quran, text analysis reveals


1 Source: see URL http://cspipublishing.com/statistical/charts.html#Bible

Read the Mueller report findings: Barr’s letter to Congress TEXT VERSION


On Friday, the Special Counsel submitted to me a “confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions” he has reached, as required by 28 C.F.R. § 600.8(c). This report is entitled “Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election.” Although my review is ongoing, I believe that it is in the public interest to describe the report and to summarize the principal conclusions reached by the Special Counsel and the results of his investigation.

The report explains that the Special Counsel and his staff thoroughly investigated allegations that members of the presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump, and others associated with it, conspired with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, or sought to obstruct the related federal investigations. In the report, the Special Counsel noted that, in completing his investigation, he employed 19 lawyers who were assisted by a team of approximately 40 FBI agents, intelligence analysts, forensic accountants, and other professional staff. The Special Counsel issued more than 2,800 subpoenas, executed nearly 500 search warrants, obtained more than 230 orders for communication records, issued almost 50 orders authorizing use of pen registers, made 13 requests to foreign governments for evidence, and interviewed approximately 500 witnesses.

The Special Counsel obtained a number of indictments and convictions of individuals and entities in connection with his investigation, all of which have been publicly disclosed. During the course of his investigation, the Special Counsel also referred several matters to other offices for further action. The report does not recommend any further indictments, nor did the Special Counsel obtain any sealed indictments that have yet to be made public. Below, I summarize the principal conclusions set out in the Special Counsel’s report.

Russian Interference in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. The Special Counsel’s report is divided into two parts. The first describes the results of the Special Counsel’s investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The report outlines the Russian effort to influence the election and documents crimes committed by persons associated with the Russian government in connection with those efforts. The report further explains that a primary consideration for the Special Counsel’s investigation was whether any Americans – including individuals associated with the Trump campaign – joined the Russian conspiracies to influence the election, which would be a federal crime. The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. As the report states: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

The Special Counsel’s investigation determined that there were two main Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election. The first involved attempts by a Russian organization, the Internet Research Agency (IRA), to conduct disinformation and social media operations in the United States designed to sow social discord, eventually with the aim of interfering with the election. As noted above, the Special Counsel did not find that any U.S. person or Trump campaign official or associate conspired or knowingly coordinated with the IRA in its efforts, although the Special Counsel brought criminal charges against a number of Russian nationals and entities in connection with these activities.

The second element involved the Russian government’s efforts to conduct computer hacking operations designed to gather and disseminate information to influence the election. The Special Counsel found that Russian government actors successfully hacked into computers and obtained emails from persons affiliated with the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party organizations, and publicly disseminated those materials through various intermediaries, including WikiLeaks. Based on these activities, the Special Counsel brought criminal charges against a number of Russian military officers for conspiring to hack into computers in the United States for purposes of influencing the election. But as noted above, the Special Counsel did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple. offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.

Obstruction of Justice. The report’s second part addresses a number of actions by the President – most of which have been the subject of public reporting – that the Special Counsel investigated as potentially raising obstruction-of-justice concerns. After making a “thorough factual investigation” into these matters, the Special Counsel considered whether to evaluate the conduct under Department standards governing prosecution and declination decisions but ultimately determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment. The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion – one way or the other – as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction. Instead, for each of the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the Special Counsel views as “difficult issues” of law and fact concerning whether the President’s actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction. The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

The Special Counsel’s decision to describe the facts of his obstruction investigation without reaching any legal conclusions leaves it to the Attorney General to determine whether the conduct described in the report constitutes a crime. Over the course of the investigation, the Special Counsel’s office engaged in discussions with certain Department officials regarding many of the legal and factual matters at issue in the Special Counsel’s obstruction investigation. After reviewing the Special Counsel’s final report on these issues; consulting with Department officials, including the Office of Legal Counsel; and applying the principles of federal prosecution that guide our charging decisions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel’s investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense. Our determination was made without regard to, and is not based on, the constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president.

In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that “the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference,” and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President’s intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloguing the President’s actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department’s principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of­-justice offense.

Status of the Department’s Review 

The relevant regulations contemplate that the Special Counsel’s report will be a “confidential report” to the Attorney General. See Office of Special Counsel, 64 Fed. Reg. 37,038, 37,040-41 (July 9, 1999). As I have previously stated, however, I am mindful of the public interest in this matter. For that reason, my goal and intent is to release as much of the Special Counsel’s report as I can consistent with applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies.

Based on my discussions with the Special Counsel and my initial review, it is apparent that the report contains material that is or could be subject to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6( e ), which imposes restrictions on the use and disclosure of information relating to “matter[ s] occurring before [a] grand jury.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(2)(B). Rule 6(e) generally limits disclosure of certain grand jury information in a criminal investigation and prosecution. Id. Disclosure of 6( e) material beyond the strict limits set forth in the rule is a crime in certain circumstances. See, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 401(3). This restriction protects the integrity of grand jury proceedings and ensures that the unique and invaluable investigative powers of a grand jury are used strictly for their intended criminal justice function.

Given these restrictions, the schedule for processing the report depends in part on how quickly the Department can identify the 6( e) material that by law cannot be made public. I have requested the assistance of the Special Counsel in identifying all 6( e) information contained in the report as quickly as possible. Separately, I also must identify any information that could impact other ongoing matters, including those that the Special Counsel has referred to other offices. As soon as that process is complete, I will be in a position to move forward expeditiously in determining what can be released in light of applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies.

As I observed in my initial notification, the Special Counsel regulations provide that “the Attorney General may determine that public release of’ notifications to your respective Committees “would be in the public interest.” 28 C.F.R. § 600.9(c). I have so determined, and I will disclose this letter to the public after delivering it to you.

William P. Barr Attorney General

Original Source: Date-stamped: 2019 March 24 | Author: William P. Barr Attorney General | Article Title: Read the Mueller report findings: Barr’s letter to Congress | Article Link: foxnews.com

Jihad Watch: Detailed Full Report March 2019 (THE MOST INCONVENIENT TRUTH)


pay attention Australia

1400 hear of Islamic Political Religious History doesn’t lie and the pattern **never never changes**

they are doing exactly what is in their holy scriptures SO WAKE UP!

Jihad Report March 2019

Attacks 105
Killed 590
Injured 683
Suicide Blasts 7
Countries 21

Source: thereligionofpeace.com

Note: These are not incidents of ordinary crime involving nominal Muslims killing for money or vendetta.  We only include incidents of deadly violence that are reasonably determined to have been committed out of religious duty – as interpreted by the perpetrator.  Islam needs to be a motive, but it need not be the only factor.

March 2019

* 31st: Country: India; City/State/Region: Baramulla; Dead: 1 [A chemist is murdered in his shop by suspected Mujahideen.]

* 31st: Country: Iraq; City/State/Region: Muqdadiya; Dead: 1; Injured: 2 [Terrorists kill a civilian and injure a father and daughter.]

* 31st: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Balkh-Jawzjan; Dead: 1; Injured: 2 [Religious extremists attack a governor’s convoy, killing a member.]

* 31st: Country: Somalia; City/State/Region: Kamsuma; Dead: 4 [Four civilians are stood up and mowed down by an al-Shabaab firing squad.]

*  30th: Country: Iraq; City/State/Region: Yathrib; Dead: 2; Injured: 1 [An ISIS attack leaves two dead.]

* 30th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Andar; Dead: 4; Injured: 17 [A ‘projectile’ hits a school during a Taliban attack, killing four young students.]

* 30th: Country: Thailand; City/State/Region: Songkhla; Dead: 2 [A latex trader and clerk are shot to death in their truck by Muslim militants.]

* 30th: Country: Somalia; City/State/Region: Dharkenley; Dead: 1 [Islamists fit a bomb onto a civilian car, sending the driver into the hereafter.]

* 30th: Country: Iraq; City/State/Region: Hammam al-Alil; Dead: 2 [Two fishermen are shot to death by the Islamic State.]

* 30th: Country: Burkina Faso; City/State/Region: Yendere; Dead: 3 [Three civilians are murdered by Jihadists.]

* 29th: Country: Pakistan; City/State/Region: Boya; Dead: 1; Injured: 1 [A civilian is sectionalized by a terrorist landmine.]

* 29th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Siory; Dead: 9; Injured: 6 [Nine local police lose their lives when armed religious extremists attack their checkpoint.]

* 28th: Country: Burkina Faso; City/State/Region: Barani; Dead: 4 [Suspected Jihadists kill four policemen and burn their vehicle.]

* 28th: Country: Somalia; City/State/Region: Mogadishu; Dead: 15; Injured: 17 [Over a dozen patrons are cut down in mid-bite by a car bombing outside a restaurant.]

* 28th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Shinkay; Dead: 5 [Five local cops are massacred by the Taliban.]

* 28th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Laghman; Dead: 2 [A child is among two killed when fundamentalists manage to hit their house with a mortar.]

* 28th: Country: Nigeria; City/State/Region: Gatamarwa; Dead: 1 [One resident is killed when Islamic extremists burn down a village.]

* 27th: Country: India; City/State/Region: Jamia Masjid; Dead: 1 [A 24-year-old man is murdered by Muslim militants.]

* 27th: Country: Nigeria; City/State/Region: Miringa; Dead: 2 [A motorist is among two people killed during a Boko Haram attack.]

* 27th: Country: Syria; City/State/Region: Tell Jabin; Dead: 9; Injured: 3 [An ISIS booby-trap claims nine civilians.]

* 27th: Country: Pakistan; City/State/Region: Lakki Marwat; Dead: 2; Injured: 4 [A woman is among two killed when terrorists open fire on a group from the education department.]

* * 26th: Country: Somalia; City/State/Region: Hodan; Dead: 1; Injured: 1 [Suspected al-Shabaab plant a bomb under a luxury car, killing the driver.]

* 26th: Country: Niger; City/State/Region: N’Guigmi; Dead: 10; Injured: 8 [Two female suicide bombers coordinate with gunmen to massacre ten villagers.]

* 26th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Shireen Tagab; Dead: 1; Injured: 6 [Terrorists sent a mortar round into a home, killing a woman.]

* 25th: Country: Libya; City/State/Region: Ghadwa; Dead: 1; Injured: 3 [A civilian is kidnapped and murdered by the Islamic State.]

* 25th: Country: Somalia; City/State/Region: Mogadishu; Dead: 1; Injured: 3 [Muslim militants kill a university professor by fitting his car with an IED.]

* 25th: Country: Syria; City/State/Region: Manbij; Dead: 7 [Seven guards are killed by ISIS at the entrance to a city.]

* 25th: Country: Israel; City/State/Region: Mishmeret; Injured: 7 [Children are among the casualties when Hamas sends a rocket into a home.]

* 24th: Country: Pakistan; City/State/Region: Chichawatni; Dead: 1 [A man honour-strangles his 20-year-old sister for ‘having relations’.]

* 24th: Country: Pakistan; City/State/Region: Lahore; Dead: 1; Injured: 1 [A woman is chopped up with an axe for marrying without her family’s permission.]

* 24th: Country: Syria; City/State/Region: Sheikh al-Nasser; Dead: 2 [ISIS shrapnel claims two civilians.]

* 24th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Sangin; Dead: 65; Injured: 38 [Armed fundamentalists overrun two local security bases and murder dozens.]

* 24th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Jalalabad; Injured: 7 [A bomb outside a clinic sends shrapnel into women and children.]

* 23rd: Country: Nigeria; City/State/Region: Mante; Dead: 1; Injured: 2 [Muslim militants attack three Christian teen sisters, raping and killing the oldest.]

* 23rd: Country: Niger; City/State/Region: Diffa; Dead: 7; Injured: 2 [Boko Haram burn down three villages, kill seven and abduct two women.]

* 23rd: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Lashkar Gah; Dead: 4; Injured: 31 [Bombs placed by religious radicals in tents at a Farmer’s Day ceremony kill four.]

* 23rd: Country: Somalia; City/State/Region: Mogadishu; Dead: 11; Injured: 15 [Sharia proponents send a suicide bomber into a government building, killing about a dozen.]

* 22nd: Country: Niger; City/State/Region: Dewa Kargueri; Dead: 8; Injured: 20 [Eight villagers are butchered with knives by Boko Haram.]

* 22nd: Country: Kenya; City/State/Region: Elwak; Dead: 5 [al-Shabaab stage a cross-border ambush that kills five Kenyan border guards.]

* 22nd: Country: Pakistan; City/State/Region: Karachi; Dead: 2; Injured: 1 [An assassination attempt on a cleric by sectarian rivals kills two guards.]

* 22nd: Country: Chad; City/State/Region: Dangdala; Dead: 23 [A Boko Haram attack on a Chadian soldier leaves two dozen dead.]

* 22nd: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Chinar; Dead: 1; Injured: 4 [A suicide bomber strikes a family on their way to a party, killing one member.]

22nd: Country: Syria; City/State/Region: Deir Ezzor; Dead: 5 [Five members of a family hunting mushrooms are executed in cold blood by ISIS.]

22nd: Country: India; City/State/Region: Hajin; Dead: 1; Injured: 1 [A 12-year-old boy is kidnapped and shot to death by Lashkar-e-Taiba.]

* 22nd: Country: Sudan; City/State/Region: Nyala; Dead: 1; Injured: 2 [Arab militia shoot a local man to death.]

* 21st: Country: Yemen; City/State/Region: Shabwa; Dead: 2 [Two people ‘on the scene’ are levelled by a Religion of Peace car bomb blast.]

* 21st: Country: Somalia; City/State/Region: Mogadishu; Dead: 1 [Suspected al-Shabaab bombers send a civil engineer to Allah.]

* 21st: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Kabul; Dead: 6; Injured: 23 [Six people are blown up for celebrating the Persian New Year.]

* 20th: Country: Pakistan; City/State/Region: Bahawalpur; Dead: 1 [A student stabs a professor to death for ‘anti-Islam’ remarks endorsing gender mixing at a party.]

* 20th: Country: Nigeria; City/State/Region: Lassa; Dead: 4 [Four farmers in a field make easy pickings for Boko Haram gunmen.]

* 20th: Country: Pakistan; City/State/Region: Sanjawi; Dead: 6 [The Taliban fire point-blank into a check post, eliminating six local cops.]

* 20th: Country: Pakistan; City/State/Region: Khanna Dak; Dead: 1 [A 17-year-old girl is  honour killed by her conservative father.]

* 19th: Country: Iraq; City/State/Region: Tarfaya; Dead: 2 [Two children are pulled into pieces by a planted bomb.]

* 19th: Country: Syria; City/State/Region: Aleppo; Dead: 2; Injured: 1 [Sunni snipers fire into a school bus, killing a 12-year-old boy and 8-year-old girl.]

* 19th: Country: Iraq; City/State/Region: Tarmiyah; Dead: 3; Injured: 5 [The Islamic State fire on a local security patrol, killing three members.]

* 19th: Country: Iraq; City/State/Region: Tarmiyah; Dead: 2 [An ISIS bomb left at an orchard causes two deaths.]

* 18th: Country: Nigeria; City/State/Region: Michika; Dead: 4 [At least five people, including a girl, are slaughtered by Jihadists during a raid on a bank.]

* 18th: Country: Nigeria; City/State/Region: Gwoza; Dead: 8; Injured: 7 [Boko Haram aerate a bus with shrapnel, killing all eight passengers.]

* 18th: Country: Netherlands; City/State/Region: Utrecht; Dead: 4; Injured: 2 [A ‘strict Muslim’ with Jihadi ties opens fire on strangers riding a tram, killing four, including a woman.]

* 18th: Country: India; City/State/Region: Reshipora; Dead: 1 [A 25-year-old labourer is taken down by Mujahid gunmen.]

* 17th: Country: Burkina Faso; City/State/Region: Djibo; Dead: 3; Injured: 1 [A priest is kidnapped, and three security personnel are killed by militant Islamists.]

* 17th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Khogyani; Dead: 1; Injured: 10 [A child is disassembled by a bomb left outside a shrine.]

* 17th: Country: DRC; City/State/Region: Kalau; Dead: 6 [Three women and a 9-year-old child are massacred by ADF Islamists.]

* 17th: Country: Syria; City/State/Region: Qabasin; Dead: 1 [A bomb left by ISIS kills a civilian.]

* 17th: Country: Mali; City/State/Region: Dioura; Dead: 23 [At least twenty-three are killed when Jama’at Nasr al-Islam wal Muslimin attacks a local army base.]

* 17th: Country: Israel; City/State/Region: Ariel Junction; Dead: 2; Injured: 1 [A rabbi is among two Israelis shot to death by a Palestinian terrorist.]

* 16th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Sar-iPul; Dead: 4; Injured: 3 [Four local cops are cut down by Taliban gunmen.]

* 16th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Arghandab; Dead: 4 [Four people are liquidated by Taliban shrapnel.]

* 16th: Country: Syria; City/State/Region: Sawanah; Dead: 4 [Four civilians are shot dead by Islamic State gunmen.]

* 16th: Country: India; City/State/Region: Shopian; Dead: 1 [A female police officer is gunned down outside her home by Muslim terrorists.]

* 16th: Country: Syria; City/State/Region: Suqaylabiyah; Dead: 1; Injured: 4 [Militant Sunnis send missiles into a neighbourhood, killing a resident.]

* 16th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Bala Murghab; Dead: 22; Injured: 20 [Twenty-two Afghans lose their lives to Taliban attacks on checkpoints.]

* 16th: Country: Burkina Faso; City/State/Region: Kompienga; Dead: 2 [Two are killed by Jihadist shrapnel.]

* 15th: Country: Mozambique; City/State/Region: Cabo Delgado; Dead: 13 [Thirteen villagers are hacked to death by Sharia proponents.]

* 15th: Country: Syria; City/State/Region: Baghouz; Dead: 6 [Three female suicide bombers strike families fleeing the caliphate, killing six members.]

* 15th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Helmand; Dead: 1 [A TV journalist is shot to death in his car by suspected radicals.]

* 14th: Country: Cameroon; City/State/Region: Sandawadjiri; Dead: 3 [Three villagers are murdered in the middle of the night by Boko Haram.]

* 14th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Sawki; Dead: 1; Injured: 13 [Suspected Taliban clear out a bazaar with a deadly bomb blast.]

* 14th: Country: India; City/State/Region: Gulzarpora; Dead: 1 [A civilian is abducted and killed by Islamic militants.]

* 14th: Country: Niger; City/State/Region: Toumour; Dead: 4 [A Jihadist car bombing claims at least four lives.]

* 13th: Country: Iraq; City/State/Region: Qara Tapa; Dead: 1; Injured: 6 [Women and children are among the casualties of an ISIS rocket attack.]

* 13th: Country: Iraq; City/State/Region: Rutba; Dead: 1 [A man collecting truffles is captured and executed by the Islamic State.]

* 13th: Country: Pakistan; City/State/Region: Dhok Soba; Dead: 2 [Two Ahmadi doctors are abducted and killed by suspected Sunni extremists.]

* 13th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Farah; Dead: 1 [A local official is murdered by suspected terrorists.]

* 13th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Farah; Dead: 10 [The Taliban storm a checkpoint and massacre ten local security personnel.]

* 13th: Country: Somalia; City/State/Region: Gof-Gadud; Dead: 8; Injured: 40 [al-Shabaab bombers murder eight patrons at a livestock market.]

* 13th: Country: India; City/State/Region: Pingleena; Dead: 1 [Islamic militants’ gun down a 25-year-old civilian.]

* 12th: Country: Burkina Faso; City/State/Region: Banh; Dead: 1 [Suspected Jihadists murder a local constable.]

* 12th: Country: Syria; City/State/Region: Amour; Dead: 4; Injured: 2 [Four people searching for mushrooms are aerated by Sunni shrapnel.]

* 12th: Country: Mali; City/State/Region: Dialoube; Dead: 6 [Six local security personnel are killed by a landmine planted by extremists.]

* 11th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Uzbekparida; Dead: 4; Injured: 4 [Four policemen are shot to death by the Taliban.]

* 11th: Country: Nigeria; City/State/Region: Anguwan Gamu; Dead: 46 [A pastor and his wife are among forty-six villagers massacred by Fulani terrorists.]

* 11th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Bala Murghab; Dead: 16; Injured: 13 [The Taliban massacre sixteen local soldiers.]

* 10th: Country: Syria; City/State/Region: Suwaiyah; Dead: 1; Injured: 1 [Sunni shrapnel brings down a civilian.]

* 10th: Country: Nigeria; City/State/Region: Shuwa; Injured: 1 [A girl is injured when two suicide bombers detonate prematurely during an attempt to kill church-goers.]

* 09th: Country: Niger; City/State/Region: Gueskerou; Dead: 7 [A Boko Haram attack on a border patrol kills seven.]

* 09th: Country: Syria; City/State/Region: Najm al-Zuhour; Dead: 2 [Two children are sectionalized by an ISIS landmine.]

* 09th: Country: Syria; City/State/Region: Arak; Dead: 8; Injured: 11 [ISIS explosives claim the lives of eight civilians.]

* 09th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Daman; Dead: 1 [A local farmer is disintegrated by an Islamist IED.]

* 08th: Country: Iraq; City/State/Region: Mosul; Dead: 2; Injured: 10 [A child is among two Iraqis picked off by Jihadi bombers.]

* 08th: Country: DRC; City/State/Region: Virunga; Dead: 1 [A park ranger is murdered by the ADF.]

* 08th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Anar Dara; Dead: 3; Injured: 3 [A Taliban attack on a security post leaves three dead.]

* 08th: Country: DRC; City/State/Region: Beni; Dead: 6 [At least one woman is among six civilians hacked to death by ADF Islamists.]

* 07th: Country: Somalia; City/State/Region: Mogadishu; Dead: 2; Injured: 5 [An al-Shabaab near a theatre leaves two dead.]

* 07th: Country: Yemen; City/State/Region: Aden; Dead: 1; Injured: 5 [Religious extremists open fire on a police patrol, killing one.]

* 07th: Country: India; City/State/Region: Jammu; Dead: 2; Injured: 32 [Hizb-ul-Mujahideen throw a grenade into a bus station, killing a teenager and one other.]

* 07th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Kabul; Dead: 11; Injured: 90 [Sunni bombers strike a Shiite political gathering, killing eleven.]

* 07th: Country: Somalia; City/State/Region: Mogadishu; Dead: 7; Injured: 9 [A group fighting for Sharia sets off a car bomb outside a restaurant, killing seven.]

* 06th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Khewa; Dead: 3 [A schoolteacher is among three gunned down in cold blood by Islamic militants.]

* 06th: Country: Pakistan; City/State/Region: Abbottabad; Dead: 1 [A man is shot dead by extremists linked to an earlier honour killing.]

* 06th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Jawzjan; Dead: 1 [Fundamentalists shoot an 8-year-old child to death.]

* 06th: Country: Iraq; City/State/Region: Makhmur; Dead: 6; Injured: 31 [An attack by ISIS leaves six dead.]

* 06th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Qala-e-Zal; Dead: 10; Injured: 12 [The Taliban storm a government check post, killing ten.]

* 06th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Jalalabad; Dead: 16; Injured: 10 [Sixteen employees at a construction company are massacred by Fedayeen in a massive suicide assault.]

* 06th: Country: Syria; City/State/Region: Jourin; Dead: 1; Injured: 6 [Sunnis send a rocket into a Shiite village, killing one.]

* 06th: Country: Iraq; City/State/Region: Tawakol; Dead: 1; Injured: 3 [An ISIS bomb blast leaves one dead.]

* 06th: Country: Nigeria; City/State/Region: Addamari; Dead: 5; Injured: 20 [Five farmers are blown to bits by a Boko Haram landmine.]

* 05th: Country: Syria; City/State/Region: Sha’afah; Dead: 2 [Two civilians lose their lives to an ISIS IED.]

* 05th: Country: France; City/State/Region: Normandy; Injured: 2 [A ‘radicalized’ inmate screams “Allah Akbar” as he stabs two guards with a knife smuggled to him.]

* 04th: Country: Yemen; City/State/Region: Hodeidah; Dead: 3; Injured: 6 Children are among three family members dispatched by an Ansar Allah rocket.

* 04th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Yangi Qala; Dead: 3; Injured: 7 The Taliban storm a market and kill three civilians.

* 04th: Country: Afghanistan; City/State/Region: Imam Sahib; Dead: 10; Injured: 9 Ten people are killed when Islamic militants storm a security checkpoint.

* 04th: Country: Yemen; City/State/Region: Taiz; Dead: 1; Injured: 11 A bomb planted at a market kills one bystander.

2019 APR 01 Hijab wearer Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Ardern Christchurch Hospital visit


The new Political / Religious Islamic Hijab wearer NZ Prime Minister clearly you don’t know the women of Iran are being beaten up and worse as they break from the *Oppressive Religious Political Laws* against Women which includes Compulsory Hijab wearing and you; Prime minister legitimises Islamic Shariah Laws ” Way to Go Jacinda Ardern:

Religious Political Islam loves you “for now”

ps. when they get full power over NZ women will not be in Parliament let alone leading a full Islamic Nation[1]Original Source: Aysha Trending TV | Published on Apr 1, 2019

Meanwhile in the Unbridled world of Islamic Political Religious Control

Here is a real Leader, not a Submitter! to Political Religious Islam

More on the Unbridled world of Islamic Political Religious Control

Screaming woman ‘is viciously beaten by women in Iran because her red headscarf is deemed an “insufficient” hijab’ 
Iran: dailymail.co.uk 19 April 2018 | By Iain Burns for Mailonline

” Way to Go Jacinda Ardern” You had to wear the symbol of oppression for women to mourn for Islamic community tragedy?????????? This is your best idea!

MEANWHILE IN IRAN. dailymail.co.uk



1 Original Source: Aysha Trending TV | Published on Apr 1, 2019