2010 OCT 29: 911 Prior Knowledge Able Danger Hearing for Lt Col Anthony Shaffer in Congress C SPAN

LET US REMIND YOU, WHO THE SWAMP CREATURES ARE!! 2010 OCT 29: 911 Prior Knowledge Able Danger Hearing for Lt Col Anthony Shaffer in Congress C SPAN https://youtu.be/u3FawI1rCTI 

This post comes from one of our syndications links which may have 3rd party Content and is subject to our Disclaimer on all content

EMERGENCY ALERT: {WWIII} or WWIV

Due to the frightening developments of the last few days Alex sounds his third Emergency Alert as the world marches dangerously close to the eruption of WWIII/WWIV.

From the elite scrambling away to armored redoubts, to the sabre rattling of Ergodan the unhinged Turkish P.M. we are hurtling towards the precipice of full scale war.

U.S. Army Mastering the Human Domain: Identity Operations for Strategic Landpower

Profile: Obama (01)

https://info.publicintelligence.net/USArmy-IdentityOperations.pdf

https://publicintelligence.net/us-army-identity-operations/

Identity Operations for Strategic Landpower

Page Count: 13 pages
Date: March 2014
Restriction: None
Originating Organization: U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
File Type: pdf
File Size: 675,619 bytes
File Hash (SHA-256): 918DED58FECE52DBA80244A12FF58C96C2C81BB207F416558CDC93FF33EA3572

Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, the strategic environment and the corresponding threats to our national security have dramatically changed.

No longer are national priorities dominated by superpowers and nation states, but increasingly by loose networks of terrorists, transnational criminals, and other non-state actors within the “human domain.”

As we have shifted into the new generation of warfare, the operational environment has evolved into a global operational environment favoring anonymous individuals who easily transform from citizen to enemy and back with limited logistical support or control.

Economic and financial globalization combined with an exponential increase information access and mass communication have set the conditions for a single non-state actor, minimally resourced, capable of dramatic strategic impact.

Just as with Archduke Franz Ferdinand’s assassin (Gavrilo Princip), actions of an anonymous individual now, more easily than at any time in recorded history, can change the course of civilization.

Today, Strategic Landpower faces a complex and interconnected global operational environment characterized by a multitude of actors with unknown identities.

This presents a wider range of possible threats than encountered before.

Our operational environment has fewer well-defined friends and foes with most actors presented along a continuum of: unknown to partially known to known, throughout the range of military operations.

Many found in the middle are susceptible to persuasion.

Each of these actors has an agenda, often at odds with our objectives, those of other actors, and the goals of the existing political order.

Besides a broad range of readily available conventional weapons, state and non-state actors can select from an array of affordable technologies, adapting them to create unexpected and lethal weapons.

Social media enables even small groups to mobilize people and resources in ways that can quickly constrain or disrupt operations.

This complex operating environment continuously evolves as conditions change and test our ability to innovate and adapt.

The complexity reconfirms the imperative to understand, plan, and employ Identity processes and capabilities within land operations.

Identity Activities

Starting with operations in Kosovo in 2001 and continuing through OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM/OPERATION NEW DAWN and OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM, the range of military operations have continually demonstrated the importance of determining and “owning” an individual’s identity in winning the tactical, operational, and strategic fight.

Similarly, functional capabilities supporting force protection, situational awareness, and force application have experienced modifications in execution based on new technologies, such as biometrics and expeditionary forensics.

These operations have illustrated the need to dramatically reshape and re engineer the structure, skill set, and tactics, techniques, and procedures of our forces.

As we refocus our training from the stability and counterinsurgency environments, it is also important to understand that Identity Activities continue to provide great value in decisive action force-on-force missions.

The evolving nature of warfare indicates that adversarial military forces may employ individuals to operate within the local populations, refugees, and detainees to disrupt friendly operations.

Strategic Landpower is at a crossroads.

Given the shift in national priorities, the Department of Defense refocuses its peacetime capabilities and activities toward the human domain in order to neutralize human threats and networks during all phases of military operations.

Enabling the disciplined application of Strategic Landpower is providing the identity of organized conventional enemy forces, whether uniformed or not, insurgents, criminals, and other adversaries, or any combination; including their networks.

Army forces focus information collection and other intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities on the discovery of true identities, and, through all-source analysis, linking these identities to events, locations, and networks to discern hostile intent.

Biometrics- and forensics-enabled intelligence, as well as, document and media exploitation support Identity Intelligence which includes Identity discovery, resolution, and exploitation. Intelligence derived from traditional sources of information, such as Signals Intelligence and Human Intelligence, continue to contribute to Identity Intelligence.

JP 1-02 defines Identity Intelligence as “The intelligence resulting from the processing of identity attributes concerning individuals, groups, networks, or populations of interest.”

These outputs enable Joint Force Command directed tasks, missions, and actions to establish identity, affiliations and authorizations in order to deny anonymity to the adversary and protect Land Force and partner nation assets, facilities, and forces.

Tasks achieved using identity operations:

• Identify an unknown individual during tactical operations

• Track a person of interest

• Control physical access

• Share identity information

Providing land force commanders and other decision-makers with robust and enduring Identity capabilities are necessary to combat future threats in these complex environments. Leadership considerations for Identity within the human domain include:

• Use of the enhanced capabilities to identify and classify the human domain; to determine whether they are adversarial, friendly, neutral, or unknown.

• Use of all-source intelligence analysts to provide back-end analysis and reporting to fuse the many sources of information (much received through operational reporting) regarding the human domain in order to identify individual(s) and their intent. Based upon risk, use of Identity data (and its fusion with other information and intelligence), will enhance force protection for bases, installations, detainee and checkpoint operations, as well as many other mission sets.

• Use of the enhanced capabilities to identify and manage local populations during major combat, stability, and humanitarian assistance and/or disaster relief operations.

Implementation of a comprehensive policy with clearly stated responsibilities and authorities to guide actions and enable the development of supporting Identity capabilities.

Jade Helm is post for this document:

it is said The Truth Will Set You Free so what do lies do?

Facts feature (08)

 

Emotions aside the real fact is “steel of that thickness cannot melt with a jet fuel fire” and yes there is military grade nano-thermite that can and did melt that steel. The only real questions to be asked is

WHO DID PLACE the ITEMS within the building

WHO PLANNED and SANCTIONED the PLAN

WHAT was the PURPOSE of POWERING UP the DESTRUCTION EFFECTS of a PLANE STRIKING the TWIN TOWERS

WHY WAS BUILDING 7 so IMPORTANT IN THE PLAN it too NEEDED TO BE DESTROYED following the COLLAPSE of the TOWERS

Building 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was part of the World Trade Center complex. It would have been the tallest high-rise in 33 states. It collapsed at 5:20 pm on September 11, 2001. It was not hit by an airplane and suffered minimal damage compared to other buildings much closer to the Twin Towers.

Fl#

List of tenants in Seven World Trade Center

47  UNDISCLOSED ??????????? 
46 Salomon Smith Barney
45 Salomon Smith Barney
44 Salomon Smith Barney
43 Salomon Smith Barney
42 Salomon Smith Barney
41 Salomon Smith Barney
40 Salomon Smith Barney
39 Salomon Smith Barney
38 Salomon Smith Barney
37 Salomon Smith Barney
36 Salomon Smith Barney
35 Salomon Smith Barney
34 Salomon Smith Barney
33 Salomon Smith Barney
32 Salomon Smith Barney
31 Salomon Smith Barney
30 Salomon Smith Barney
29 Salomon Smith Barney
28 Salomon Smith Barney
27 Salomon Smith Barney, Standard Chartered Bank
26 Salomon Smith Barney, Standard Chartered Bank
25 Internal Revenue Service,  ** DoD ** , ** C I A **  
24 Salomon Smith Barney, Internal Revenue Service Regional Council
23 Salomon Smith Barney, New York City Office of Emergency Management
22 Salomon Smith Barney, Federal Home Loan Bank
21 Salomon Smith Barney, First State Management Group, Inc, ITT Hartford Insurance Group
20 Salomon Smith Barney, ITT Hartford Insurance Group
19 Salomon Smith Barney, ITT Hartford Insurance Group, NAIC Securities
18 Salomon Smith Barney, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
17  UNDISCLOSED ??????????? 
16  UNDISCLOSED ??????????? 
15  UNDISCLOSED ??????????? 
14  UNDISCLOSED ??????????? 
13 Salomon Smith Barney, Provident Financial Management, American Express Bank International, Securities & Exchange Commission, Standard Chartered Bank
12 Securities & Exchange Commission
11 Securities & Exchange Commission
10  ** U S S S ** , Standard Chartered Bank
9 U.S. Secret Service
8 American Express Bank International
7 American Express Bank International, Provident Financial Management
6 Salomon Smith Barney
5 Salomon Smith Barney
4 Salomon Smith Barney
3 Salomon Smith Barney
2 Salomon Smith Barney
1 Salomon Smith Barney
G Salomon Smith Barney

 

Tenant Square Feet Leased Floors Occupied Industry Notes
Salomon Smith Barney 1202900 0–6, 13, 18–46 Financial Institutions
Internal Revenue Service Regional Council 90430 24, 25 Government
U.S. Secret Service 85343 9,10 Government
American Express Bank International 106117 7, 8, 13 Financial Institutions
Standard Chartered Bank 111398 10, 13, 26, 27 Financial Institutions
Provident Financial Management 9000 7, 13 Financial Institutions
ITT Hartford Insurance Group 122590 19–21 Financial Institutions
First State Management Group 4000 21 Insurance
Federal Home Loan Bank 47490 22 Financial Institutions
NAIC Securities 22500 19 Insurance
Securities & Exchange Commission 106117 11, 12, 13 Financial Institutions
New York City Office of Emergency Management 45815 23 Government

 

Full Disclosure Hon Paul T Hellyer

FYI For Your Interest (01) feature
money-matters

“The Money Mafia: A World in Crisis”.

Paperback: 336 pages
Publisher: Trine Day (October 1, 2014)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1634240065
ISBN-13: 978-1634240062

“The Money Mafia: A World in Crisis”. [con’t]
Exposing perceived fault lines in our banking and financial systems and explaining how unemployment could be cut in half in two years and worldwide prosperity restored, this book argues the existence of exotic energy sources to replace fossil fuels and consequently recommends an immediate end to fracking and offshore drilling for oil. It further urges an immediate worldwide mobilization to replace the energy source in every car, truck, tractor, ship, airplane, and house on Earth in seven years in a desperate effort to save the planet from further overheating. The book blasts government secrecy, and more than 65 years of supposed lies and disinformation, and demands full disclosure of what they know about visitors from other realms and their technology and the extent of their collaboration, including any treaties that may have been signed by them. With more than 65 years of participation in and observation of political and economic systems—beginning with the Great Depression, extending through World War II, the postwar era of hope for a better life, the Cold War, the subjugation of democracy by oligarchy, and the subtle but continuous militarization of America—Paul T. Hellyer analyzes what he believes has gone wrong with the world and its economy and suggests radical measures to introduce a universal culture of peace and cooperation.

British Oligarchy planning new 9/11 to trigger World War III?

WWIII (WW3) feature (01)
CEC of Australia First published , 11 September 2014

To prepare the agenda for the 4-5 September 2014 NATO summit in Wales, the British Parliament’s House of Commons Defence Select Committee on 29 July issued a lengthy report entitled “Towards the Next Defence and Security Review: Part Two—NATO”. Chief among its bloodcurdling recommendations for NATO preparations towards a final showdown with Russia, was the downgrading of the famous Article 5 of the NATO Charter, which specifies that an “armed attack” against any of NATO’s 28 members is an attack against them all. Without offering proof, the Committee claimed that Russia is now deploying “asymmetric”, “ambiguous”, or “deniable” acts of war such as “information” or “cyber” war, as well as irregular units of “little green men”.

As the chief example of threats for which NATO must be prepared, the Committee cited the 11 September 2001 attack on the Twin Towers in New York:

“The use of airliners hijacked for attacks in New York and the Pentagon in the USA in 2001 were considered sufficient to invoke a NATO Article 5 response, even though not immediately attributable to any nation state but to non-state actors.”

Even though no nation state could be identified as the author of 9/11, the declaration of Article 5, “the only one since the inception of NATO”, had justified the NATO-spearheaded invasion of Afghanistan, the report pointed out (emphasis added). It stated that such “vicarious” or “deniable” actions must be expected more frequently in the future—on the part of Russia, “as in the situation in Ukraine”.

Taking the cue, British Prime Minister Cameron warned at a 2 September meeting of EU leaders in Brussels, on the very eve of the summit, against “appeasing [Russian President] Putin as we did Hitler”. The British, with the wholehearted support of U.S. President Obama, rammed through an agreement to upgrade a British-led NATO Rapid Reaction Force for permanent deployment in Eastern Europe, while the UK announced plans to form still another force, British-led but not formally under NATO, including Denmark, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Norway and the Netherlands.

Why is the British Empire step-by-step, relentlessly whipping up the political and military atmosphere for a final showdown with Russia? Because the City of London/Wall Street-centred financial empire could explode any day now, and Anglo-American power along with it. Moreover, the recent emergence of a new world economic order around the BRICS alliance, led by Russia and China and committed to rapid rates of technological and industrial growth, will soon eclipse the collapsing Anglo-American trans-Atlantic system.

The original 9/11: the setting

In the wake of near-cataclysmic GFC of 2008, many have forgotten the sequence of accelerating, severe financial crashes that set the stage for 11 September 2001. Set in motion by the end of the Bretton Woods system of physical economic growth in 1971 and the shift to a speculative, looting system, these included:

  • The “Asia crisis” beginning July 1997, which saw the devastation of many Asian nations under speculative attack by London and Wall Street;
  • The 27 October 1997 “Black Monday” Wall Street collapse, now almost forgotten, but which was much larger even than that of October 1929.
  • The August 1998 Russian GKO bond crisis, which almost triggered a global meltdown.
  • The consequent September 1998 collapse of the U.S.-based Long Term Capital Management (LTCM) hedge fund, which came within a whisker of detonating that global financial collapse.
  • The manufactured “Y2K” crisis of 2000.

Surveying this pattern shortly after the election of London/Wall Street puppet George W. Bush (whose Wall Street banker grandfather Prescott Bush had financed Hitler’s rise to power in Germany) as U.S. President, the world’s leading economic forecaster, Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr., warned on 3 January 2001, eight months before 9/11:

“What you’re going to get with a frustrated Bush Administration, if it’s determined to prevent itself from being opposed—its will—you’re going to get crisis-management. Where members of the Special Warfare types, of the Secret Government, the secret police teams, and so forth, will set off provocations, which will be used to bring about dictatorial powers and emotion, in the name of crisis-management.”

The morning of 9/11

At the moment reports of the attacks on the Twin Towers hit the airwaves, LaRouche was giving a live radio interview to Jack Stockwell of KTKK-AM (“K-Talk”) in Salt Lake City. LaRouche commented, “The first suspicion that’s going to be on this is Osama bin Laden.” Once the later, Pentagon attack was reported, LaRouche, a veteran of decades in intelligence and security matters, exclaimed: “You can’t go around snatching planes in a coordinated fashion, like this. You can’t do it.” [LaRouche’s radio interview is featured in the LPAC video documentary on 9/11, Ten Years Later.]

Consider the chronology of that fateful morning. Between 8:25 a.m. and 8:32 a.m. the Federal Aviation Administration’s Boston Center flight controllers reported that Flight 11 had been hijacked. The North Tower was hit at 8:46 a.m. and the South Tower hit at 9:03 a.m. The Pentagon was not hit until 9:37 a.m. This building—the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Defense—presumably the most protected building in the world, was hit more than an hour after the first reported hijacking, yet not a single fighter jet had yet been scrambled from Andrews Air Force Base—just 18 kilometres from the Pentagon. These were well-practiced routines. With more than 4,500 aircraft continuously sharing U.S. airspace on any given day, the Pentagon between September 2000 and June 2001 had launched fighters on 67 occasions to escort wayward aircraft.

Despite the shutdown of all air travel shortly after the attacks and for days following, some planes did manage to fly. A private jet landed in Washington D.C. later on 11 September, carrying the head of the British secret intelligence service (MI6) and the deputy chief of Britain’s domestic intelligence service (MI5). By the end of the week, another private flight was granted clearance to leave the USA, this one carrying some 140 Saudi Arabian citizens, including 24 members of the family of Osama bin Laden—the man credited with the attacks.

Thousands of highly qualified experts have pointed out the impossibility of the official line of the U.S. and British governments: “Al-Qaeda did it alone.” Though most influentials who knew better were cowed from speaking out, some did:

  • Dr Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, observed that “Washington’s explanation of the attack implied a security failure too massive to be credible.” A former presidential appointee to high office, Dr Roberts’ high-level security clearances and knowledge of FEMA national emergency policy well qualifies him to make such statements.
  • Former German Defence Minister Andreas von Bülow has also long charged that 9/11 was an inside job: “I know a lot of people, including very influential ones, who agree with me, but only in whispers, never publicly.”
  • Former British Environment Minister and long-time MP Michael Meacher, in a 6 September 2003article in The Guardian, “This war on terrorism is bogus”, devastated the official account, and asked socratically, “Could U.S. air security operations have been deliberately stood down on September 11?”

Orchestrated “terrorist” events as provocations are not new in history. Elected as Chancellor of Germany in January 1933, Adolf Hitler was widely regarded as a joke who would soon pass from the scene. But his Nazi party set fire to the Reichstag on 27 February 1933, which allowed Hitler to consolidate a police state within Germany and set the course for World War II. In 1962, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff drafted Operation Northwoods, which called for Pentagon secret warfare units to kill innocent Americans and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities, creating public support for a war with Cuba, a plan vetoed by President John F. Kennedy.

The still-classified 28 pages: The British/Saudi authorship of 9/11

Two days ago, on 9 September 2014, three U.S. Congressmen joined seven family members of those killed in the 9/11 attacks in a powerful Capitol Hill press conference, demanding that President Obama fulfil his long-standing promise to declassify the 28 pages of the Joint Congressional Inquiry into the 9/11 events that were withheld from its report, released in 2002. This issue also received powerful coverage on CNN on 8 September. Those pages document the role of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in supporting the terrorist attack. Indeed, long-time Saudi Ambassador to the United States Prince Bandar bin-Sultan, along with his wife, aided, abetted, and personally financed some of the hijackers in the United States for a period of two years before the attacks. An intimate of the Bush family, Bandar bin-Sultan later became head of the Saudi Intelligence Agency, on top of operations promoting “Islamic fundamentalism” all over the Middle East and beyond.

But the story goes deeper still. As LaRouche’s Executive Intelligence Review magazine has documented in the explosive series of dossiers listed below, the real story of 9/11 begins in London in 1985, when Bandar-bin Sultan, an intimate of Prince Charles, met British PM Margaret Thatcher and set up what became infamous as the “Al-Yamamah Affair”, a 20-year deal between the giant British Aerospace firm BAE and the Saudi monarchy for massive British arms shipments to Saudi Arabia in return for oil, a deal worth anywhere from $100 to $160 billion. This massive deal provided a multi-billion dollar “slush fund”, which Bandar used to build up Al-Qaeda and other Islamic terrorist groups. Al-Yamamah was investigated for years by U.S. and British authorities, but its patrons in the British Crown, the City of London and Wall Street ultimately managed to cover up most of the evidence of a worldwide criminal and terrorist combine. Bandar personally received $2 billion out of the deal, which went through Saudi accounts at the Riggs Bank in Washington and were likely used to finance some of the chief actors in 9/11, those documented to have received an estimated $75,000 in “charitable donations” from his wife.

The consequences

British Prime Minister Tony Blair pyramided the lies of 9/11 into still a bigger lie: that Iraqi president Saddam Hussein had “weapons of mass destruction” that could hit Western capitals “within 45 minutes”. This argument became the pretext for the Anglo-American-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. Iraq and Afghanistan have been virtually destroyed by the “war on terror”. According to a 2006 survey published inThe Lancet, 601,027 violent deaths out of 654,965 excess deaths (those above the normal expected rate) related to the Iraq War occurred between March 2003 and June 2006 alone. At least 174,000 civilians have died violent deaths as a result of the “war on terror” in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan as of April 2014. Illicit opium production in Afghanistan increased 40-fold after 9/11 (especially in the zones occupied by the British Army), poisoning literally millions of human beings on the Eurasian continent and beyond.

Meanwhile, the “war on terror” has been used to justify ever stronger police states throughout the trans-Atlantic sector and including Australia, as typified by the omnipotent surveillance of virtually all communications of any type by the “Five Eyes” intelligence arrangement, centred at the U.S. National Security Agency and Britain’s Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) in Cheltenham. Already in 2002, the Howard government used 9/11 to push through a set of draconian “anti-terror” laws, which have been amplified since. The Abbott government’s proposed National Security Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2014, now before parliament, will grant immunity from prosecution to ASIO and its affiliates for any crimes committed in the course of a special intelligence operation. Cameron has just announced that the UK faces “the greatest terror threat in history” (The Telegraph, 29 August) and has raised Britain’s threat level to “severe”—the second highest level, meaning that a terrorist attack is considered “highly likely”. This new threat level was declared by MI5’s Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre, which reports to no one in the UK government structure, but solely to the Crown. Almost daily the Anglo-American and Australian press reports on dozens or hundreds of American, British or Australian jihadis who will soon be streaming home to launch mayhem in the lands of their birth.

The pathway out: Glass-Steagall and a BRICS-centred New World Economic Order

As with the financial crises leading into the original 9/11, the British Crown and the City of London-Wall Street nexus are hysterical at the prospect that the next, even deeper global financial crash will crush their imperial power forever. Rather than wait for that to happen, they have launched wars all over, international terrorism, and now a likely thermonuclear showdown with Russia, in order to maintain their imperial system. We must break their power through the implementation of a Glass-Steagall-style breakup of their “Too Big To Fail” banks, and establish new institutions to direct credit into an industrial and agricultural renaissance, as the BRICS nations are now doing. It’s either that, or you’ll wake up one day before long to some British-rigged “new 9/11” in Eastern Europe, to be blamed on Russia, as forecast so recently by Her Majesty’s House Defence Select Committee.

DOCUMENTATION

“Scandal of the Century Rocks British Crown and the City”, Jeffrey Steinberg, Executive Intelligence Review, 22 June 2007. The original EIR expose which blew the lid on the Al-Yamamah affair and the real authors of 9/11

“U.S. Investigation Takes Direct Aim at Anglo-Saudi ‘Al-Yamamah’ Pot of Gold”, Jeffrey Steinberg, EIR, 30 May 2008. Reports on official investigations by U.S. and British governmental agencies into BAE and Al-Yamamah corruption, money-laundering, and ties to 9/11.

“Bust the London-Riyadh Global Terror Axis”, EIR Special Report.

“The British Monarchy, Saudi Arabia, and 9/11”, Richard Freeman and William F. Wertz, Jr., EIR, 23 May 2014. A devastating account of the decades-long, intimate ties between the Royal Family’s Prince Charles and Bandar bin-Sultan and the most evil faction of the Saudi monarchy.

Background information is available in the EIR Special Report, “Obama’s War on America: 9/11 Two”.Click here to purchase a copy.


Click here : for a free copy of the latest edition of Executive Intelligence Review magazine, which analyses the British push to position NATO to instigate a war against Russia. EIR is the weekly journal founded 40 years ago by U.S. statesman Lyndon LaRouche to investigate and name the names of those behind current events; it has been called the finest private intelligence service in the world.